Get your url shortener just in one click

Showing posts with label Movie Reviews. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Movie Reviews. Show all posts

Gunajn Saxena: The Kargil Girl Full Movie Review

 Gender equality ki taraf badhney ke liye, kayee saareysystemic changes ki zaroorat hai cultures mein, yes. Mass communication ka, iss field mein kya yogdaan hai,yeh mudda na pechida hai, thoda isko samjhein.



Gunajn Saxena: The Kargil Girl, despite having the nameof an actual war in its title, is not about the war, and to a huge extent is not even about Gunjan Saxena.

While the story follows the Air force officer’s life,from when she was a kid, till the Kargil war, it focuses mainly on what Gunjan represents,in a landscape, that is both unreal, and extremely relatable at the same time.


I approach war movies with slight trepidation now.Is this going to glorify violence? Is overt nationalism going toovershadow the storytelling? Is this going to be just another loud background scored,yet bland depiction of events as they took place, without attaching any nuance to the whole unfortunateand ghastly reality that a war is? Writers Nikhil Mehrotra and Sharan Sharma,the latter also being the director, don’t focus on the chest thumping, that inadvertentlybecomes the main focus of so many films about war.
Their writing, despite being setwith Kargil in the background, despite almost all the main characters being soldiers,is still about what it is to be a woman in this world, trying to make space in male dominated fields.


Ek scene mein, Gunjan apney mahaa progressive father,played by the most amazing Pankaj Tripathi sey, ek raat panic mein kehti hai, ki “air force mein aiseycadets hone chaahiye jin mein desh bhakti ho". "Mujhey toh bass plane udaana hai”, to which her father replies, that the air force needscadets who are sincere honest and hard working, not people who will just yell “Bharat Maata Ki Jai”.
Iss scene ko yahaan kyun daala, kyunki abhi takthe only conflict the film had put forward, was that, no one takes Gunjan seriously when she says thatshe wants to fly, toh yeh naya self-doubt kyun? Isliye, kyunki film aapko steer kar rahi hai, aur solidify kar rahi hai apna message,that this is not a tale that wars are fought at borders, but its about battles this woman had to fight,just to be able to do, what she wanted.



And that’s pretty great clarity of thought, don’t you think. Director Of Photography, Manush Nandan too,doesn’t treat this like a war film. There are very few scenes of actual battle, and gunsand things, most action sequences are rescue ops, and the camera operates on a human level,as opposed to viewing people as killing machines. Achcha, you know what’s refreshing? The film’s acknowledgment thatwomen and men are different, and for women to be taken seriously as people, there doesn't need to be more man-like behavior in theirattitude, in their traditional sense of the term. To achieve this,Jahnvi Kapoor borrows from her own personality.

She has a bit of sadness about her. Her face, without moving a muscle even,depicts deep seated unhappiness and a struggle to come to terms, with sexist realities likethe lack of women’s toilets at her posting in Udhampur. She is soft spoken and slightly timid,when we first meet her, and remains so, right till the end. Even when in war, she doesn’t suddenly turn intoTiger Shroff and starts flying choppers, while hanging upside downand shooting enemies at the same time.


She tells someone else to do it. Because she finds no joy in disobeying direct orders,or yelling at her supervisors. In one scene she barges into a partyand yells haphazardly at a senior officer. Here too, she’s confused aboutwhat she is hoping to achieve, and her words are not words of ahero who is showing the soft-villain, his rightful place, jiskey baad soft-villianka hriday parivartan ho jaayega. But through the film, Gunjan is very muchher own kind of woman, feminine in her own way, with only her determination as a tool to make her way,through horribly unbalanced systems, never tipped in her favor.


Unlike last week’s Shakuntala Devi, this film,doesn’t cram too much into the screenplay. When we meet Gunjan at different ages in her life, (a fun little montage, has her go from10th pass, to 12th pass, to Bachelor’s degree), these jumps are only used to establish her characterand her relationship with her constantly present family, and her gradual understanding,of the aforementioned systems of the world, as opposed to long drawn out episodes,which come and go at breakneck speeds. Most of the actual action and conflict,is set at the IAF institute in Udhampur and some in Srinagar during the Kargil war,


which really gives us time and space to…you know….get involved. The best dialogue, very generously,has been given to Pankaj Tripathi, who, I toh just cant get enough of,at all, ever, please give me more. Because Gunjan is naive and unaware, and her mother and older brother are not interestedin empowering her much beyond education, its her father, who silently fights for her,in every way possible.


The machismo brought by Angad Bedi, playing the olderbrother and Vineet Kumar, playing a supervising officer, is not rewarded at the end of the film. They actually kind of, in slightly clumsy moments,even accept defeat.


Which I can’t even believe is a real thing that happened. Ergo, like I said in the beginning,Kargil ki kahaaniyaan sunkar unreal toh lagti hain, par ek aurat ki kahaani, har field mein, ekk chhoti battle,ya badi war, hoti hi hoti hai, isliye jaan-boojh kar, yeh generic message baar-baar repeat kiya gaya hai,joh film ko, zaraa simplistic toh banaata hai, lekin iss mass communication kemedium ka sahi prayog bhi hai.


Gunjan Saxena, as a 24 year old,only woman in the Kargil war, contributed towards saving nearly a 1000 lives. It’s a story of determination and patriotism,but also compassion and humanity. A mix of sentiments, which Sharan Sharmabalances quite successfully.

So, on a scale of 1 to 10, Gunjan Saxena:  The Kargil Girl is……..24 saal ki umar mein kya karr rahey they aap? Main radio pe tab gaane chalaati thi.32 mein bhi aakar kya hi teer maar rahi hoon? Subscribe to Film Companion, ab filmein bhi aa rahi hain,toh main bhi aati rahoongi. Jai Hind. 
Share:

Why People's Are Hating Sadak 2?

Why sadak two is getting dislikes the reason behind dislike is Sushath singh rajput's death suicide or murder it wasn't clear but whatever happened with SSR after that talks of Nepotism came out so in that all the actors and actresses who have their parents in the film industry they get support they get extraa benefits good movies are given to them they are preferred  .

so for that reason Nepotism came to limelight the people of india got angry all the movie goers, layman, critics whoever came to know about nepotism they got angry .

so the movies which came recently were of small celebrities like lootcase next was dil bechara and there was no other movie but sadak 2 trailer that came out recently that is like an example of Nepotism in this movie sanjay dutt is  there his father is sunil dutt ... alia bhatt is there mahesh bhatt's daughter aditya roy kapoor and pooja bhatt it's like complete package of nepotism you can even right in the subtitle of the movie "product of nepotism" .

that is the reason of dislikes   trailer got so many dislikes it is also increasing so let us see how many dislikes are given to the movie or how it is rated   dil bechara got positive review and positive promotion so it got 10\10 in imbd i think this movie sadak 2 will get one star out of 10 ratings.
Share:

Aamir Khan Film Lal Singh Chaddha May Break the Most Dislike Record On Youtube

The Bollywood actor super star Aamir khan currently in Turkey to the shooting of his upcoming flim Laal Singh Chaddha and visit Turkey first Lady Emine Erdogan at Huber Mansion in Istanbul .
Actress Kareena Kapoor also the part of this flim. 
This flim was supposed to release on this Christmas but due to the deadly coronavirus disease the flim now release on Christmas 2021.


On Monday , a large number of Indians have expressed their disappointment with the meeting of Amir Khan and Eardagon at a time when the reletion between India and Turkey are not so good.

Yesterday Amir khan was trending on Twitter but all for negative reasons .
Fans did not like him  meeting the Turkish first lady .

Everything between India and Turkey was great , but turkish president  Recep Tayyaip openly hated and criticized India after the Anti and pro CAA Protester in New Delhi in February .


Article 370 was scarapped in Kashmir last year the reletion between India and Turkey was bad .



The fan were disappointed with the meeting of Amir khan with the president of Turkey .

And fan were called Amir khan an empitome of hypocrisy .

Amir khan upcoming movie Laal Singh  Chaddha tralier could become the disliked video after Sadak2 tariler .






Erdogan posted the picture with Amir khan on her official Twitter account and wrote "   I had the great pleasure of meeting @aamir _khan, the world - renowned Indian actor , filmmaker , and director , in Instanbul .  I was happy to learn that Amir decided to wrap up the shooting of his latest movie ',Lal Singh Chadha ' in different parts of Turkey  I look forward to it .



@TrulyMonica tweeted while @iAnkurSing

many like them are the haters of the three khan they are tweeted against Bollywood actor Amir khan, Salman Khan and shahruk khan , they are trying to troll them " Amir khan refused to meet Indian's friendly Israel's PM .

After the meeting of the lady Amir khan fans are very upset and disappointed due to the bad reletion between Turkey and India Many people are started hated the Amir Khan and they were decided to disliked his upcoming flim tralier. 

After the Death of Shushant Singh Rajput  the fans of Bollywood are divided they are against the star kid and the nepotism actor and after the meeting of Amir khan people are very unhapp.

Share:

Class of '83 | Bollywood Movie Review by Anupama Chopra | Bobby Deol

 Class of 83 is a gritty drama, about a batch of policeofficers, who become famed encounter specialists. The backdrop is the early 80's,when Mumbai was in the grip of notorious gangsters. The film is inspired by a book named The Class of 83:The Punishers of Mumbai Police by S. Hussain Zaidi, which in turn is based on the lives of real-life cops,like Pradeep Sharma and Vijay Salaskar, who trained under DGP Arvind Inamdar,when he was head of the Maharashtra Police Academy.

 These names are the stuff of legendand controversy in the Mumbai police archives. But the film begins with a disclaimer, which says it is awork of fiction, which is followed by a quote from Plato, which says: "Good people do not need lawsto tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws". Which presumably provides the justification forkilling bad people, without arrest or trial. The vigilante cop is a staple of Hindi cinema.

From Salman Khan in Dabangg, to Ajay Devgn in the Singham series, to Rani Mukerji in Mardaani, we’ve seen a slew of trigger-happy cops,who sidestep political interference and institutional corruption by breaking the law. It's an immensely satisfying fantasy, which allows us,the audience, to believe that justice has been served. But in a year, in which police brutalityhas repeatedly made headlines, this movie archetype hasbecome even more problematic.

Class of 83 offers little innovationon the time-worn theme. Except perhaps the counter-intuitive casting ofBobby Deol as Dean Vijay Singh, the tough and tortured head of the Academy. Deol, best-known for putting his urbane good-looks togood use in 90s blockbusters like Gupt and Soldier, does an about-turn here. The dean is a man with a tragic past and a poker face. Bobby’s frayed handsomenessunderlines the Dean’s grief. He’s a committed, honest cop, which is why he’sat the Academy on a punishment posting.

But Vijay Singh decides to subvert the systemby training five cadets to take down gangsters. He calls it an experiment – as he puts it,the five will function like antibodies, who will cleanse the disease from within the body. 

He gives these backbenchers a talk about,why he's chosen them, saying, “Tum log dosti nibha lete ho, lekin sach bhi bol lete ho,rules todte ho, lekin usool nahi chodte, fail hote ho lekin apni sharton par". Which instantly took me back to Thakur in Sholay,explaining why Veeru and Jai are the perfect candidates to hunt the notorious dacoit Gabbar Singh – he says: "Woh badmaash hai lekin bahadur hain, khatarnak haiisliye ki ladna jaante hain, bure hain magar insaan hain". Class of 83 uses the same trope of a senior cop,executing justice through young and brave men, whom he handpicks.

The only difference is that in Sholay,Veeru and Jai are criminals. Here the Dean’s instruments are cops. The cadets are played by newcomers Ninad Mahajani,Bhupendra Jadawat, Sameer Paranjape, Hitesh Bhojraj and Prithvik Pratap,all of whom deliver solid performances.

Casting new actors as newbies adds conviction to thenarrative, because no actor asks for more attention. Each one serves the story. The first part of the film followstheir lives in the police academy and the latter follows the batch, as they embark on their careers, ferociously demolishing gangs. As one of the five, Aslam tells us:"To maintain order, law ko bali chadhana padta hai".

This is familiar turf for director Atul Sabharwal,who 18 years before Sacred Games, gave us Powder – the seminal television series about cops and gangsters. Atul has a great talent for creating grim worlds. Here he and DoP Mario Poljac workwith a palette of brown and dull green. There’s mist, rain, shadows. The sun rarely shines, literally or metaphorically. 

The textures of 80's Mumbai are skillfullyconstructed with attention to period details. There are these gorgeous shots of Marine Drivewith minimal traffic and a shoot-out in a dhow, which instantly took me back to gangsterclassics like Nayakan and Parinda. The atmospherics are enhanced by Viju Shah’sthumping, old-school background score. I especially liked two key scenes in whichthe five friends share a meal together.

Atul choreographs the changing group dynamicsand the splintering of this group with finesse. And yet, these parts don’t coalesce into a whole withheft. To begin with, the subject matter induces fatigue. Little about the plot feels new or urgent. And the script by Abhijeet Shirish Deshpanderelies too much on exposition, which is provided by Aslam’s voice-over. The writing doesn’t flesh outthe cadets or the Dean enough. Some are provided a defining feature,but we don’t get a sense of them as people. They are, for the most part, one note-characters. Bobby delivers the pathos and frustration of the Dean inseveral scenes, but in others, he seems to be posturing.

And some of his dialogue is melodramatic,not in a good way. At one point, he asks: "Koi kya kare agar woh apne aas paas kaamkarne walon se behtar ho, system se behtar ho, gala ghot de woh apne talent ka, ban jaye mediocre kisi50 crore, 100 crore members ki tarah"? As I watched, I wondered,is Atul perhaps here speaking about himself and the several other actors and directors,who feel undermined by Bollywood? Geetika Tyagi, who played a key role in Powder, helps tobreak up the overwhelming masculinity of this world, with her graceful presence,but there isn’t enough for her to do.

She’s only there to give the Dean a backstoryand again, it’s a one we’ve seen before. Too much of Class of 83 feels like a retread. The faces are new, but theportrayal of the system, corruption, the utter lawlessness of both copsand criminals, is familiar. The film doesn’t offer new insight or characters,compelling enough to make this material feel fresh. Which is why, despite the talent on display,it doesn’t soar. You can watch Class of 83 on Netflix. 
Share:

Mean Tweets : Avengers Infinity War Edition

Avengers: Infinity War one of the biggest movie of 2018. But even Avengers have haters. we like to shine a white-hot light on the trolls on twitter and that was really mean tweets. And now here's a all Avengers edition of #MeanTweets featuring all avengers stars including Tom Hiddleston, Anthony Mackie, Scarlett Johansson, Sebastian Stan, Winston Duke, Elizabeth Olsen, Don Cheadle, Dave Bautista, Benedict Cumberbatch, Tom Holland, Samuel L. Jackson, Paul Rudd, Karen Gillan, Paul Bettany, Chadwick Boseman, Chris Pratt & Chris Evans.
Mean Tweets : Avengers Infinity War Edition
Photo: Screengrab
Mean Tweets : Avengers Infinity War Edition
Photo: Screengrab
Mean Tweets : Avengers Infinity War Edition
Photo: Screengrab
Mean Tweets : Avengers Infinity War Edition
Photo: Screengrab
Mean Tweets : Avengers Infinity War Edition
Photo: Screengrab
Mean Tweets : Avengers Infinity War Edition
Photo: Screengrab
Mean Tweets : Avengers Infinity War Edition
Photo: Screengrab
Mean Tweets : Avengers Infinity War Edition
Photo: Screengrab
Mean Tweets : Avengers Infinity War Edition
Photo: Screengrab
mean-10_050218122203.jpg
Photo: Screengrab
mean-11_050218122213.jpg
Photo: Screengrab
mean-12_050218122221.jpg
Photo: Screengrab
mean-13_050218122234.jpg
Photo: Screengrab
mean-14_050218122242.jpg
Photo: Screengrab
mean-15_050218122251.jpg
Photo: Screengrab
mean-16_050218122301.jpg
Photo: Screengrab
mean-17_050218122318.jpg
Photo: Screengrab
Watch The Full Video of #meanTweets #AvengersEdition






Share:

Joker | Hollywood Movie Review by Anupama Chopra | Joaquin Phoenix | Todd Phillips

 To say that Joker is a disturbing film would be to give the word disturbing weight that it wasn'tdesigned for.

 Joker is frightening, haunting and so problematic that I had trouble speaking for hours after watching the film and lost some sleep. That sounds dramatic, but it's how I respond to films and this character - one of pop culture's greatest villains has the power to do that. Heath Ledger's Joker in The Dark Knight was the stuff of nightmares.

 To look at him was to look into the heart of darkness. But, in Joker, director Todd Phillips and actor Joaquin Phoenix take it further. They place us inside his head. We see what causes a mentally ill loner to blossom into an unhinged killing machine, and we sympathize with him. We're repulsed by him, but we're also rooting for him to tear down the indifferent smug establishment.
 The Joker unleashes anarchy and we smile with him as he watches the world burn. The film gets into your bloodstream, because it's so skilfully crafted. At the centre, of course is Phoenix as the Joker. But for most of the film, we don't see him as the crown prince of crime.
Joker playing card
 This is an origin story and the formidable Joker is a wretched clown for hire named Arthur Fleck. Phillips and his co-writer Scott Silver reimagined the comic book world, so Joker is a period film with a gritty, frayed Scorsese-style quality. The CGI is at a bare minimum. The film is set in the late 1970s-early 80s New York and carries the DNA of films of that era like Taxi Driver, The King of Comedy, DogDay Afternoon, Network. DOP Lawrence Sher and art director Laura Ballinger do a masterful job of rendering an urban hell.
 Gotham is quite literally a mess becausethe sanitation department is on strike. There's trash everywhere and theresidents seemed to be stewing in stench and sickness, especially Arthur. Arthur's mother calls him Happy, which is a grand irony because as Arthur tells us, he hasn't been happy for one minute of his entire life.

 Most people treat Arthur like the garbage that they're side-stepping on the pavement and his tenuous grip on reality slowly comes about. As he says, it's enough to make anyone crazy. You've never seen crazy done like Phoenix does it.
Heath Ledger The Joker x Ronald McDonald graffiti
 Arthur suffers from a condition that makes him laugh uncontrollably, but this laughter is like a breath away from tears. There are scenes in which he barely seems human. Phoenix is so thin that when he removes his shirt, you can see bones sticking out at impossible angles. Arthur is pathetic, but his eyes flash a gleam of the delight that comes from having nothingto lose. When he kills, his angular wiry body seems to reverberate with power.

 Phoenix is practically in every frame of this film. He's hypnotic and he holdsJoker together. The other actors which includes Robert De Niro playing a talk-show host Arthur worships are eclipsed by Phoenix’s show-stopping performance.
shallow focus photography of clown and dog figurines
 In any case, the film is so intensely focused on Arthur and justifying his descent into madness that it doesn't substantiate the other threads of the narrative, like a subplot of a romance with the neighbor. Yes, Batman makes an appearance, but he's a child. At one point, Arthur writes in his diary the worstpart about having a mental illness is that people expect you to behave as though you don't. Ultimately, though the filmdoesn't take this insight anyway.

 Joker gives us a view of a deranged world, but it never attempts to offer more than a simplistic causality. As social commentary, it's pretty thin and morally spacious. Joker is artful nihilism. And despite its dazzle, it's hard for me to get behind that. 
Share:

Top 10 Horror Movies from 2010 to 2020

 Number 10:     The Nun
 When a young nun at a cloistered abbey in Romania takes her own life a priest with a haunted past and a novitiate on the threshold of her final vows are sent by the Vatican to investigate Together they uncover the order's unholy secret. Risking not only their lives but their faith and their very souls they confront a malevolent force in the form of a demonic nun.

 The Nun is an American gothic supernatural horror film directed by Corin Hardy and written by Gary Dauberman It is a spin-off of 2016's The Conjuring 2 and the fifth installment in the Conjuring Universe franchise. The nun is a must watch movie for all of you .

 Number 9:     Mama

 After their parents' deaths, two young girls are forced to reside in a house that has a dark and ominous presence Even after getting rescued, the evil forces follow them to their new home. Mama is a supernatural horror film directed and co-written by Andy Muschietti in his directorial debut and based on his 2008 Argentine short film Mama.


 The film follows two young girls abandoned in a forest cabin, fostered by an unknown entity that they fondly call "Mama Mama has a very unique and compelling story line and you should watch this one.

 Number 8:      Lights out

 A women is haunted by a creature that only appears when the light go out Rebecca and her boyfriend try to investigate the connection between her mother and her imaginary friend  Diana after her stepfather is murdered by a supernatural entity. it stars Teresa Palmer, Gabriel Bateman and Maria Bello. Lights out is highly recommended for fans of horror movies.


 Number 7:     Sinister

 Sinister is a 2012 supernatural horror film directed and co-written by Scott Derrickson. True-crime writer Ellison Oswald is in a slump, he hasn't had a best seller in more than 10 years and is becoming increasingly desperate for a hit. So, when he discovers the existence of a snuff film showing the deaths of a family, he vows to solve the mystery. sinister is an undeniably scary movie and a must watch for all of you.


 Number 6:     Insidious

 Josh and Renai move to a new house, seeking a fresh start. However, when their son, Dalton, mysteriously falls into a coma, paranormal events start occurring in the house. Insidious is an American-Canadian supernatural horror film directed by James Wan and written by Leigh Whannell.


It is the first installment in the Insidious franchise, and the third in terms of the series' in-story chronology. The story centers on a couple whose son inexplicably enters a comatose state and becomes a vessel for ghosts in an astral dimension who want to inhabit his body. Insidious has a strong plot, excellent basing and its filled with suspense.

 Number 5:    The Autopsy of Jane Doe

 The Autopsy of Jane Doe is a supernatural horror film directed by Andre Ovredal When father and son coroners investigate the death of a beautiful Jane Doe, they find increasingly bizarre clues.


 This movie is a complete package of nightmares The unfolding of the mystery behind jane doe is truly gripping. A very solid movie overall bringing true terror Its creepy, disgusting, confusing and above all truly amazing, the mystery is maintain throughout, definitely a good one in horror genre.

Number 4:         It

 Seven helpless and bullied children are forced to face their worst nightmares when Pennywise, a shape-shifting clown, reappears. The clown lives in the sewers and targets small innocent children. It is the first film in the "It" film series as well as being the second adaptation following Tommy Lee Wallace's 1990 miniseries The movie "it" has fear, sadness, happiness, anger, hurt, suspense and every possible emotion you can think off It is an amazing film to watch.

 Number 3:      Hereditary

 When the matriarch of the Graham family passes away, her daughter and grandchildren begin to unravel cryptic and increasingly terrifying secrets about their ancestry, trying to outrun the sinister fate they have inherited. Hereditary is an American supernatural horror tragedy film written and directed by Ari Aster, in his feature film directorial debut.


 The devotion of the actors to their respective characters is amazing and intensely scary Hereditary is one of those films that comes only once in a blue moon. It is a well crafted master-peace to watch

Number 2:    A Quiet Place

A family struggles for survival in a world where most humans have been killed by blind but noise-sensitive creatures. They are forced to communicate in sign language to keep the creatures at bay.


 The plot revolves around a father and a mother who struggle to survive and raise their children in a post-apocalyptic world inhabited by blind extraterrestrial creatures with an acute sense of hearing. A quiet place has a very unique concept, and its filled with suspense and emotions. A must watch for all of you.

 Number 1:      The Conjuring

 Based on a true story, "The Conjuring" tells the horrifying tale of how world renowned paranormal investigators Ed and Lorraine Warren were called upon to help a family terrorized by a dark presence in a secluded farmhouse The Conjuring is an American supernatural horror film directed by James Wan.


 It is the inaugural film in the Conjuring Universe franchise A true story-based movie that creeps the senses out of you. A movie to prove you wrong if you think that nothing can possibly scare you. Amazing acting by the actors and a fair amount of jump scares. A good movie for horror movie fans. 
Share:

Why I Won't Be Reviewing Dil Bechara | Sushant Singh Rajput | Anupama Chopra

 The truth is for me, there is no way to doan unbiased review of Dil Bechara. I found it hard even to watchthe trailer of the film. It dropped on July 6th, around three weeks afterSushant Singh Rajput’s death on June 14th. It was difficult to see him play a jovial cancer patient,laughing, dancing and wooing his co-star.

 His dialogue, "Janam kab lena hai,aur marna kab hai, hum decide nahi kar sakte... par kaise jeena hai,woh hum decide kar sakte hain" it took on a whole new meaning. Every frame reminded me, of what was lostand what could have been. Sushant was that rare thing –a strong actor with star presence and this was apparent from his first film Kai Po Che! I loved his performance inShuddh Desi Romance.

 I wrote in my review that his character,“the irresistibly goofy Raghu” is “easily the most charming guide in Hindi cinema,since Dev Anand’s Raju in Guide”. I was one of the few fans ofDetective Byomkesh Bakshy. His work in MS Dhoni: The Untold Storyand Sonchiriya was terrific. Even in uneven films like Kedarnath, he held his own.

 I didn’t know Sushant well,but I interviewed him several times over the years, the last being for the promotionsof Chhichhore in September. He was smart, candidand always ready to experiment. In December 2016, he featuredon our first FC Unfiltered. We recorded the showwith students at Jai Hind College. In 2017, we shot a show in which he tried to explainhis enigmatic tweets and Instagram posts.

 This wasn’t to promote a film,or to talk about his journey. He took out time only to tryand explain how he thinks. Sushant’s death is a loss for Hindi cinema. The circus which has followedhis passing is equally sad.

 Instead of respectful introspectionand trying to figure out how we can all do better, what is mostly on display is rank opportunism. The possibility of real change has been hijackedby personal agendas and settling scores.

 It’s ugly and utterly graceless. In such a vitiated atmosphere, it’s impossible for me to see Dil Bechara in isolationand gauge it on its own merits. I have no wish to contribute further to the noise. I wish director Mukesh Chhabraand his team all best for their film. I hope the troubled journey of Dil Becharafinds a happy ending. And Sushant, wherever he is,finds a semblance of serenity. 
Share:

Shakuntala Devi Full Movie Review and Storyline

 Shakuntala Devi is the biopic of a woman without limits. The real life Shakuntala was a math wizard,who was famously known as the human computer.

Her name was in the Guinness Book of World Records.

 She was also a globe-trotting stage performer,an in-demand astrologer, a best-selling book author, who wrote one of the earliest records, of what it means to be gay in Indiaand an aspiring politician who stood for elections.

 This was a woman fueled by ambition and dynamism,who refused to be curtailed by societal norms. In the film, she says, "Jab amazing ho sakti hoon, toh normal kyun banu"? But genius comes at a price.

Shakuntala’s marriage fell apartand her relationship with her daughter was so strained, that at one point, she filed a criminal case against her.

 There is enough material here for a franchise – I think her book called The World of Homosexuals, in which she made a case for gay rights in the 1970s,could be a film in itself. Such a rich and varied life can be daunting for any storyteller.

Director Anu Menonand co-screenplay writer Nayanika Mahtani, make the unwise decisionof trying to squeeze all of it in. The result is an uneven film,in which we get a frantically busy plot, but not enough dramatic thrust.

 The narrative hopscotches acrossdecades, milestones, cities. The screenplay alternates between Shakuntala’s journeyand her daughter Anupama’s life. The first hour plays like a highlights reel.

 We see Shakuntala rise to fameand riches with numbers floating, like in A Beautiful Mind,each time she does a calculation. But we get little sense of her inner life,her moments of loneliness or doubt.

 What was it like to be born with such an exceptional gift,to have numbers reveal themselves to you, so that you could give the 23rd rootof a 201- digit number in 50 seconds.

And surely it couldn’t have been easyfor an Indian woman in the 1950s, to make a name for herself in London.

 The film glosses over isolation, racism and sexism. Before you know it, Shakuntala is living the good life.

 Shakuntala Devi gathers emotional momentumin the second hour when the film focuses on thefraught relationship between her and Anupama and the parallels in their lives.

 Shakuntala, who started performing from the age of 6, resented her parents for making her a show ponyand the sole earning member of the family. But as she grows older,she comes to understand their compulsions.

 Anupama undertakes the same journeyof reconciliation with her mother. The film is positioned as“a true story as seen through the eyes of a daughter.” The real-life Anupama and her husband,are the first people thanked in the opening credits.

 This relationship provides the spine of the film. Because we see the chinksin Shakuntala’s formidable armor. She is impulsive, insecure, selfish, even arrogant. And it is in these moments,that we are drawn into her life.

 Vidya Balan does a splendid job of embodyingthis walking contradiction of a woman. She captures Shakuntala’s ability to command any roomshe enters, but Vidya also, with empathy, finds her flaws.

 Her and the lovely Sanya Malhotra,flesh out this thorny relationship, even when the writing is working against them. In a pivotal scene, Shakuntala and Anupamaare being affectionate toward each other.

 The onlookers, all men, look them, shake their head'sand say: Mothers and daughters. It’s clumsily staged and yet somehow,the performers make it work. The film’s glossy aesthetic also contributesto making the story less affecting.

 The camerawork, production design, costumesand make up is all so varnished, that the complexities and challenges of Shakuntala Devi’s life,are inadvertently smoothened out.

 In any case, the screenplay isn’t interestedin detailed exploration – In one scene, after solving a tough motherhoodversus career problem within minutes, Shakuntala herself remarks:"Itni jaldi problem solve hogayi.

 Maine toh socha tha bade pathaake chalenge". But these fireworks never come. And some of the most dramatic moments of her life, like finding out that her ex-husband is gay,are discreetly tiptoed around.

 Menon and the writers work hard to createcompelling portrait of a woman whose very existence defied patriarchy – even her sari and braids playeda key role in breaking stereotypes.

 But the film fails to fully examine the tension betweenthe clarity that Shakuntala Devi found in math and the messiness of her life.

 In a 1996 interview in Hong Kong, Shakuntala Devi said:"Nobody challenges me. I challenge myself". I wish her biopic had that samenote of defiance and daring. You can see Shakuntala Devi on Amazon Prime. 
Share:

Khuda Haafiz Full Movie Review and Storyline

 When you watch a Vidyut Jammwal film, the firstquestion is: When does the fighting start? For almost a decade now,

Vidyut who is famous for doing his own stunts and whose skills include theancient martial art Kalaripayattu,has been decimating bad guys onscreen with finesse.


His films, like the Commando franchise,position him as a one-man army, who pummels, slices, kicks and pirouettes. Nothing can stand in the way of the Jammwal offensive.

 In Commando 3, he saved India,while keeping his manbun in place. In Khuda Haafiz, writer-director Faruk Kabir tries toexpand the Vidyut Jammwal repertoire.

the film has been inspired by a true incidentand the fighting doesn’t begin until around minute 56. Until then, Khuda Haafiz establishesthe love story between Vidyut, playing a Lucknow-based software engineer Sameerand his newly wed wife, Nargis.

 It’s a Hindu-Muslim arranged marriage,but Faruk doesn’t explore this intriguing premise further. The couple is grappling with more practical realities,like a global recession.

 It’s 2008. After losing their jobs, both apply to companies in thefictional Middle-Eastern country of Noman. Nargis leaves first, but disappears from the airport. A distraught Sameer follows to unravelthe mystery of his missing wife.

 The set-up isn’t new. The missing wife has been atrope in cinema for decades. In fact, Roman Polanski’s 1988 film Frantic,had a similar situation of a man, Dr.

 Richard Walker played by Harrison Ford,searching for his wife in a foreign country, France, where language becomes a stumbling block. 20 years later, Liam Neeson was also looking for hismissing daughter in Paris in the blockbuster Taken.

 Faruk tries to build authenticity and suspense byhaving characters speak extensively in Arabic, only some of which is translated for the audience.

The idea, the director has said, is for viewers to experience the same sense offrustration and desperation that Sameer does.

 Which might be good in theory, but in practice,it stalls the movement and makes the film dreary. Annu Kapoor, playing Usman, an impossibly helpfultaxi driver, livens up the frame momentarily.

 Usman speaks Hindi, which makesSameer’s and our lives a little easier. But the screenplay isn’t tight enough to createthe sense of urgency, that Sameer feels.

 The plot plods along for almost an hour,until the first action set-piece arrives. I got happier when Vidyut clenched his fists. The action, choreographed by Ivanov Victorand Andreas Nguyen, is raw and furious.

 The first few minutes are stagedin this long narrow corridor, while Sameer is sort of plunging this knife,into all these men who are trying to hold him.

 Bones break with a crunching sound andone man’s jaw is split apart by the edge of a wall. It’s not an easy watch. Once the fighting begins,the visuals get more grotesque, at one point, Sameer is having a conversation with a man,who has this fork and a knife sticking out of his body.

 It’s both brutal and unintentionally comical. Khuda Haafiz has been extensively shot in Uzbekistan. Faruk and DoP Jitan Harmeet Singhmake good use of the landscapes – from the singular architecture and sand-colored homes,to the barren highways.

 At one point, we get a Mad Max-style chase,with swirling clouds of dust. For a change, Vidyut is playing a savior,who isn’t in superman mode. Sameer gets hurt and bleeds.He faints and even sheds tears. The story requires Vidyut to deliver a range of emotions.

 He pushes himself, but is still most convincing,when he is inflicting pain. Shivaleeka Oberoi, who plays Nargis, has little to do,except first be childlike and naïve and then wait to be saved. Faruk works hard to infuse agritty realism into the narrative, but ultimately Khuda Haafiz falls intothat same sort of silly territory, that Vidyut Jammwal action movies often do. Logic exits the frame.

 The villains become more outlandish. Nargis, despite her ordeal, continues tolook surprisingly fresh-faced and healthy. Indian actors like Shiv Panditt and Aahana Kumra,playing Noman locals with clumsy accents doesn’t help. Neither does the stilted dialogue –at one point, Usman tells Sameer: "Tum jisko karz kehte ho, Pathan usey farz maanta hai". Usman of course, is the latest, in the long line ofcourageous and loyal Pathans in Hindi cinema, going back to the iconic Sher Khanin Prakash Mehra’s Zanjeer.

 Khuda Haafiz wants to be both – an emotional love storyand an unflinching action drama, but it falls somewhere in between. You can watch the film on Disney+Hotstar. 
Share:

Sample Text

Copyright © All LinkShortener | Powered by Blogger Design by ronangelo | Blogger Theme by NewBloggerThemes.com | Free Blogger Templates